Skip to content
All publications

NewsCord

NewsCord

The Andrew Gilligan dossier

Andrew Gilligan has worked at the BBC, the Telegraph, the Sunday Times, City Hall and Downing Street. Today he writes for The Spectator and Policy Exchange, and his main subject is British Muslims. This dossier sets out his career, what he writes, what the NewsCord Watchdog found in it and the people he has written about.

Nima Akram

Willow4 (CC BY-SA 3.0) Source

NewsCord

Earn £50,271 and you can settle in Britain in five years. Earn less and you wait ten. Come by small boat and you wait up to 30. This is Andy Burnham's government.

On Monday Shabana Mahmood told MPs that the right to live in Britain for good must now be earned. Her rules sort people by their salary and by how they got here, and they apply to more than 500,000 people already living here. Kemi Badenoch proposed most of it first. Andy Burnham's Labour government is the one doing it.

Nima Akram

Jonathan Chen / Home Office (CC BY 4.0) Source

NewsCord

UK papers printed the Board of Deputies against Palestine solidarity in 64 articles. Palestinians got to answer in 4.

Britain's papers have made the Board of Deputies the voice of British Jews on Palestine. They print its attacks on Palestine solidarity as the Jewish community's verdict, never tell readers its constitution commits it to "advance Israel's security, welfare and standing", and shut Palestinians out of stories about their own land.

Nima Akram

Labour Palestine (CC BY 2.0) Source

NewsCord

A gunman shot people in Trappes for looking Muslim or African, and killed Pengo Bossio Wangi. The media made it a story about the protests, buried the motive and moved on.

Kévin T. admitted he chose his victims by how Muslim or African they looked, in a town he called "a haven for Islamists". We read 90 English-language articles from 41 outlets. They folded the killing into the protests, called it random, and 32 of the 41 never reported his confession.

Nima Akram

Henry Salomé (CC BY-SA 3.0) Source

NewsCord

Fox News and the New York Post ran 36 headlines tying Abdul El-Sayed to terror, Islamism or the Muslim Brotherhood. Not one of their 289 headlines called the attacks baseless.

We examined 920 headlines about El-Sayed from 141 outlets and 740 stored articles. Fox and the Post carried the smear from August onwards and almost never told their readers it had nothing behind it. The charts compare headline subjects, who made the allegations and whether the articles assessed the evidence.

Nima Akram

Conlan Houston (CC BY-SA 4.0) Source

NewsCord

UK Lawyers for Israel keeps crying wolf. Regulators keep finding nothing. Hospitals and councils take Palestine down anyway.

UKLFI has reported dozens of charities to Britain's regulators. Where we could find the outcome, the regulator found nothing against the charity in 11 cases out of 14. Its letters to hospitals, councils and colleges work better: Gaza children's art, nurses' badges and Palestinian flags have come down after them.

Nima Akram

Jaber Jehad Badwan (CC BY-SA 4.0) Source

NewsCord

Lula won. These headlines gave Bolsonaro’s rejection equal billing.

In our English-language sample, 35.1% of Brazil result headlines included the loser’s challenge, against 26.7% for Ecuador. Sky put Bolsonaro’s rejection in its headline and González’s below it. CBS buried the fact that both Brazilian campaigns had asked for extra voting time.

Nima Akram

Ricardo Stuckert/PR (CC BY 2.0) Source

NewsCord

Wes Streeting put IHRA into the NHS after a group linked to the Israel Medical Association asked for it. He gave the review to the man who had just chaired the Board of Deputies' commission.

In December 2024 the Health Secretary met the Board of Deputies, whose constitution commits it to "advance Israel's security, welfare and standing", and the Jewish Medical Association asked him for IHRA. Ten months later the NHS adopted it, and the review went to Lord Mann, whose office a charity runs on £420,000 of uncompeted government grants. We followed the money.

Nima Akram

Robert Lamb (CC BY-SA 2.0) Source

NewsCord

Sir David Bell, the "independent" antisemitism reviewer, was accused of Islamophobia in 2005. A pro-Israel charity has listed him on its council for ten years.

The government said the man who wrote its antisemitism review was independent, with no conflict of interest. He was being paid by a government agency. In 2005 he singled out Muslim schools as a challenge to "our coherence as a nation", and a charity whose one firm policy is opposing boycotts of Israel has named him on its council since at least 2016. We followed the money.

Nima Akram

Robert Graham (CC BY-SA 2.0) Source

NewsCord

Lucy Powell wants every school in England to adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Seven of its eleven examples are about Israel.

Sir David Bell's review used it to say a view held by 45% of British adults, that Israel treats Palestinians like the Nazis treated Jews, could be antisemitic. It was committed to the definition before it heard any evidence. A charity whose one firm policy is opposing boycotts of Israel lists Bell on its council. Four of 37 reports told readers what the definition says about Israel.

Nima Akram

Sebastiandoe5 (CC BY-SA 4.0) Source

NewsCord

The papers wrote 447 articles on the Greens' Zionism vote. Israel, pro-Israel groups and the Chief Rabbi got 12,133 words. Palestinians got 3,173.

Between 1 and 20 October, 37 British national outlets covered one motion at one party conference. Israel's government alone got more words than every Palestinian put together, and 2,422 of the Palestinian words sat in stories tying the motion's author to al-Qaeda. Not one of 89 comment pieces backed the motion. Not one headline said genocide.

Nima Akram

Rawanmurad2025 (CC BY-SA 4.0) Source